Hey folks. Sorry to have been absent on this thread for a while. Ultimately the issue was never resolved. Whatever the last firmware push was made the issue better, but still not fixed. I have just adjusted my timing and temps to address.
Scouter,
Thanks for the update. My firmware is up to date, so my app tells me.
I have not resolved my Searwood's fickle cooking temperatures (see my original post) despite long and generally constructive communications with Weber Australia and Weber USA. It would be fair to say that the Weber folks on both continents are mystified by the cool-cook issues I'm raising. Clearly they are not reading the forums.
Because they are entitled to test whether my problems arise from operator failure (I am a Searwood novice after all, though competent on the much more problematic charcoal Weber kettles), we agreed to test my Searwood against Weber recipes. I'm midway through yet another cook, adhering strictly to the recipe again - a small Texas-style brisket this time. It's already half a day past the predicted cook time and we are still 30C short of the internal temperature at which the recipe said I should be resting the wrapped parcel. The War Office is growling about the dinner delay. I've had to bump the cook temperatures up a couple of times to force the cook. The recipe said I shouldn't need to do that.
I'm not the first to say this but my observation is that if you get an under-performing Searwood (we're not alone here), you're stuck with a smoker which does not comply with the precision set-and-forget promises of Weber marketing. I'm inclined to believe that the Youtube dudes celebrating the Searwood's superior brisket cooking are all on crack.
As I said originally, I think Weber have a problem with this product. The premium price we pay here in the Colonies (NZ) demands genuinely reliable cooking according to Weber's own recipes. On one previous test cook when the lamb was rare and chewy inedible, Weber Australia said the target internal temperature of the recipe was too cold. Really? I don't think it's acceptable that you and I should be experimenting our way to an understanding of the Searwood's sweet spots.
As things stand, the War Office snarling in the kitchen, I cant recommend the Searwood 600.
PS. My retailer has offered to refund me for my Searwood 600 purchase. Were it not for my disappointment in the Searwood, I would buy another and try again. Would I be lucky next time? I don't want a repeat of this grief.